Yes, yesterday I left a message under Sam’s Twitter about my plan: to realize digital democracy by establishing a credit “blockchain” system, which is similar to when it is discovered that rumors are spread through AI technology, and by sending Credit “Blockchain” users issue rewards (of course, users who receive rewards are also divided into credit ratings, which are similar to the weights in the current virtual currency. When encountering particularly difficult events, then we will send “masters” to investigate the integrity of the event The process, believe me, the user who can get the credit rating of “Master” at that time is definitely not an idle person, at least he does not work for money), let them collect evidence to verify the authenticity of the event, if the event is fake, then We can prosecute the liar through the chatGPT lawyer, and then send the compensation paid by the liar to the “detective”. Of course, the credit exchange can draw a certain handling fee (although I think this handling fee should be paid by the United Nations), and then, We have obtained a “social credit model” in the AI era that can operate efficiently. I mainly refer to the decentralization of “blockchain” technology, so that the truth can be in the hands of the people as much as possible, and capital can be used as an auxiliary. To make this mechanism run for a long time under the current system, I know that it has the taste of an AI trial court, but the difference is that there can be more “opportunities” under this mechanism, which are similar to our fish at the beginning. The ancestors chose to climb onto the land instead of giving the initiative to such news giants as Murdoch, and let the politicians behind these news giants control the truth, although the latter AI tribunal will also be understood by the politicians Rules, but as I said, those users who can become “masters” should have an unyielding “Sherlock Holmes” in their hearts. 